Lesley J. Smith, a.k.a. Lesley J. Scott - Page 20




                                       - 19 -                                         
          fact or law.  See Jonson v. Commissioner, supra at 125; Woodral             
          v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 19, 23 (1999).                                    
               Section 6015(f) provides:                                              


                    (1) taking into account all the facts and                         
                    circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the                      
                    individual liable for any unpaid tax or any                       
                    deficiency (or any portion of either); and                        
                    (2) relief is not available to such                               
                    individual under subsection (b) or (c),                           
               the Secretary may relieve such individual of such                      
               liability.                                                             
               As directed by section 6015(f), the Commissioner has                   
          prescribed procedures to be used in determining whether the                 
          requesting spouse qualifies for relief from joint and several               
          liability under section 6015(f).  As applicable to the present              
          case, these procedures are set forth in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-           
          1 C.B. 447.6  The requesting spouse must satisfy seven conditions           
          (threshold conditions) before the Commissioner will consider a              






               6Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, which supersedes Rev.            
          Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447, is effective for requests for               
          relief under sec. 6015(f) filed on or after Nov. 1, 2003, and for           
          requests for such relief pending on, and for which no preliminary           
          determination letter had been issued as of, that date.  Rev.                
          Proc. 2003-61, sec. 7, 2003-2 C.B. at 299.  Rev. Proc. 2003-61,             
          supra, is not applicable in this case because (1) petitioner                
          filed her request for relief on Aug. 9, 2002, and (2) respondent            
          issued a preliminary determination on May 23, 2003.                         





Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007