Lesley J. Smith, a.k.a. Lesley J. Scott - Page 26




                                       - 25 -                                         
               4.  Knowledge or Reason To Know                                        
               The fact that the requesting spouse did not know or have               
          reason to know when she signed the returns that there was an                
          understatement of tax or that the taxes would not be paid favors            
          granting relief.  The fact that the requesting spouse knew or had           
          reason to know when she signed the returns that there was an                
          understatement of tax or that the taxes would not be paid weighs            
          against granting relief.  In resolving whether in signing a tax             
          return a requesting spouse had reason to know of the                        
          understatement of tax in the return, we consider whether the                
          requesting spouse was aware of the circumstances of the                     
          transaction(s) that gave rise to the error(s) in the return.                
          Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. at 115; Bokum v. Commissioner,             
          94 T.C. 126, 145-146 (1990), affd. 992 F.2d 1132 (11th Cir.                 
          1993).                                                                      
               In determining the taxpayer’s knowledge, we may examine                
          several factors, including:  (1) The requesting spouse’s level of           
          education; (2) the requesting spouse’s involvement in the                   
          family’s financial affairs; (3) the nonrequesting spouse’s                  
          evasiveness and deceit concerning the family’s financial affairs;           
          and (4) the presence of expenditures that are lavish or unusual             
          when compared to the requesting spouse’s past standard of living.           
          See Stevens v. Commissioner, 872 F.2d 1499, 1505 (11th Cir.                 








Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007