- 29 - the requesting spouse did not know or did not have any reason to know that the nonrequesting spouse would not pay the income tax liability. Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(1)(e), 2000-1 C.B. at 449. Petitioner and Mr. Scott’s divorce decree placed the legal obligation to pay the $1,200 unpaid tax liability for 2000 exclusively on Mr. Scott. Mr. Scott was also obligated to pay “any other marital debt not specifically included” in the divorce decree. Respondent asserts, however, that petitioner knew or had reason to know, at the time that the divorce judgment and decree was entered, that Mr. Scott would not pay the tax liability. We disagree. Petitioner first learned that Mr. Scott had failed to pay taxes when Mr. Scott filed for bankruptcy in 1995. During the bankruptcy proceedings petitioner suggested to Mr. Scott that they try to arrange installment payments to pay their Federal taxes. Mr. Scott told petitioner to stay out of it because it was his business and he would handle it. There is nothing in the record to suggest that when the divorce decree was signed in 2001, petitioner knew, or should have known, that Mr. Scott would not pay the taxes. Therefore, we conclude that this factor favors petitioner.Page: Previous 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007