Darryl R. and Kristi L. Stephens - Page 5




                                        - 4 -                                         
          revoked the job offer.  Mr. Stephens continued to work for NWA in           
          Minnesota for 14 months, until March 2004.                                  
               Mr. Stephens’ position in Minnesota had no specific end                
          date.  After Mr. Stephens was bumped from his position in                   
          Georgia, no NWA position was available for him to return to in              
          Georgia.  He was forced to bump other employees and work in a               
          different city to stay with NWA.  Mr. Stephens expected to return           
          to Georgia as soon as a job became available in Georgia, with NWA           
          or otherwise, that he could obtain.  NWA’s needs for mechanics in           
          Georgia as well as the choices of the other mechanics also                  
          subject to the seniority system would influence the timing of Mr.           
          Stephens’ return to an NWA position in Georgia.                             
               Mrs. Stephens and petitioners’ family members remained in              
          Georgia at the family residence while Mr. Stephens worked in                
          Minnesota.  Mr. Stephens lived with his parents in Otsego,                  
          Minnesota, while he worked in Minnesota.  Mr. Stephens returned             
          to Georgia occasionally to visit his family.                                
               Petitioners claimed they contributed some items to charity             
          in 2003.                                                                    
          Petitioners’ Return                                                         
               Petitioners claimed deductions for certain expenses on                 
          Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, on the joint return for 2003.              
          Respondent examined the return for 2003 and issued petitioners a            
          deficiency notice in which he disallowed many of the expense                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007