- 10 - did not know how long he would be in Minnesota or where he might go next. It was not foreseeable that he would be able to return to Georgia at any time due to the seniority system and the job market. Thus we conclude there was no business reason for petitioners to maintain a home in Georgia. Petitioners kept the family residence in Georgia for purely personal reasons. Petitioners have failed to prove that Mr. Stephens had a tax home in 2003. Accordingly, Mr. Stephens was not away from home when he worked as an NWA mechanic in Minnesota, and the expenses he incurred while there are not deductible.4 Noncash Charitable Contributions We next turn to whether petitioners are entitled to a noncash charitable contribution deduction of $1,413. We begin by noting the fundamental principle that the Commissioner’s determinations are generally presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving that these determinations are erroneous.5 Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111 (1933). Moreover, deductions are a matter of legislative grace, and the 4Even if we had found that Mr. Stephens’ tax home during 2003 was in Georgia, Mr. Stephens may not be treated as temporarily away from home while he worked in Minnesota because the position lasted over a year. See sec. 162(a). 5Petitioners do not claim the burden of proof shifts to respondent under sec. 7491(a). Petitioners also did not establish they satisfy the requirements of sec. 7491(a)(2). We therefore find that the burden of proof remains with petitioners.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007