- 2 - The issues for decision are: (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to deduct the expense of flight school as an educational expense under section 162(a); and (2) whether petitioner is liable for the accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a). FINDINGS OF FACT The parties’ stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference, and the facts stipulated are so found. At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Castro Valley, California. Petitioner graduated from San Jose State University with a bachelor of science degree in aviation operations. Petitioner is currently employed as an aeronautical engineer2 with Planners Collaborative, Inc. (Planners), a subcontractor which provided engineering and technical management services to support the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Ames Research Center. Prior to his employment with Planners, from August 2000 through October 2004, petitioner was employed as an aeronautical engineer with Teculan Inc. (Teculan), a subcontractor which also provided engineering and technical management services to NASA. 2 The parties also referred to petitioner as a systems engineer.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007