George E. and Gloria Tschetschot - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               For 2000, the taxable year in issue, Mrs. Tschetschot earned           
          approximately $49,000 in wages.  She also participated in nine              
          poker tournament series, winning in excess of $11,000.4                     
               Mrs. Tschetschot claimed a net loss of $29,933 from her                
          “professional gambler” activity in 2000 on her Schedule C, Profit           
          or Loss From Business.  Mr. Tschetschot claimed a net loss of               
          $9,000 from his “professional gambler” activity in 2000 on his              
          Schedule C.                                                                 
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $10,071 based on the             
          view that the deductions claimed by petitioners related to their            
          gambling activities were not appropriately Schedule C deductions,           
          but rather deductions allowable on Schedule A, Itemized                     
          Deductions, but only to the extent of petitioners’ winnings.                
          Respondent also determined an accuracy-related penalty under                
          section 6662(a) of $2,014.                                                  
               At trial, petitioners conceded the issue as to Mr.                     
          Tschetschot but disputed the determination as to Mrs.                       
          Tschetschot.  Respondent conceded Mrs. Tschetschot’s status as a            
          professional, as well as the corresponding treatment of certain             
          expenses related to her professional gambling activity.                     


               4  The amount of Mrs. Tschetschot’s stipulated winnings                
          totals $13,269, whereas she reported only $11,708.  Respondent              
          discusses this discrepancy in his posttrial brief by saying that            
          “Respondent did not adjust this discrepancy because the                     
          unreported winnings would have been offset by allowance of losses           
          that were disallowed.”                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011