Estate of Daphne Baynham White, Deceased, Kemble White, Independent Executor - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
             $3,935.  The estate’s motion is governed by section 7430                 
             of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter all section                    
             references are to such Code, unless stated otherwise) and                
             by Rules 230-233 of the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
             Procedure (hereinafter all Rule references are to such                   
             Rules).  The estate’s motion was filed at the same time the              
             parties filed a stipulation of settled issues in which they              
             dispose of all of the other issues in the case.  See Rule                
             231(c).  The stipulation of settled issues is further                    
             discussed below.  Neither party requested an evidentiary                 
             hearing, and we decide the estate’s motion without one.                  
             See Rule 232(a)(2).                                                      
                                     Background                                       
                  The petition in this case asks the Court to                         
             redetermine the income tax deficiency and additions to tax               
             determined by the Commissioner in the 2001 income tax of                 
             Ms. Daphne Baynham White.  Ms. White died on November 30,                
             1999.  At that time, she was a resident of Ojai,                         
             California.  She is referred to herein as Ms. White.  The                
             executor of her estate also resided in Ojai, California, at              
             the time the instant petition was filed.                                 
                  Respondent determined the subject tax deficiency after              
             receiving reports from various payors of payments made to                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011