Stanley C. Wolcott - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Accordingly, the Court concludes that petitioner is liable             
          for the section 6651(a)(1) and (2) and section 6654(a) additions            
          to tax for his 2000 and 2001 taxable years.                                 
          III.  Section 6673(a)(1) Penalty                                            
               Respondent, in his pretrial memorandum and on brief, has               
          asked the Court to impose a penalty under section 6673(a)(1).               
          Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Tax Court to impose a penalty             
          not in excess of $25,000 on a taxpayer for proceedings instituted           
          primarily for delay or in which the taxpayer’s position is                  
          frivolous or groundless.  “A position maintained by the taxpayer            
          is ‘frivolous’ where it is ‘contrary to established law and                 
          unsupported by a reasoned, colorable argument for change in the             
          law.’”  Williams v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 136, 144 (2000)                  
          (quoting Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir.                 
          1986)).                                                                     
               Because the Court has already classified arguments regarding           
          the PRA as frivolous and as tax-protester arguments, petitioner             
          should have known of the frivolous nature of his position in this           
          case.  See, e.g., Andreas v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-551              
          (characterizing as frivolous an argument that Commissioner’s                


               8(...continued)                                                        
          rejected in United States v. Dawes, 951 F.2d 1189, 1191-92 (10th            
          Cir. 1991).”  Id.  Finally, we have already rejected reliance on            
          Pond for the proposition that 1995 amendments to 44 U.S.C. sec.             
          3512 should alter the manner in which we view arguments based on            
          the PRA.  See Pate v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-132.                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007