Robert and Grace Bergevin - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
               duties to Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin.  During that same time                
               period, Jay Hoyt was also under tax return preparer                    
               penalty investigation by the IRS, which also                           
               contributed to his conflicts of interest and his                       
               inability to represent Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin.                          
               Notwithstanding the effect of IRS investigations on the                
               TMP’s fiduciary duties to the partners, the IRS                        
               determined in 1989 that a number of circumstances                      
               caused Jay Hoyt to have debilitating conflicts of                      
               interest and that he, in fact, breached his fiduciary                  
               duty to the partners.  For example, Mr. Hoyt apparently                
               did not raise questions concerning the treatment of                    
               guarantee payments to the investors, when those                        
               payments were not paid to the investors but credited as                
               IRA payments that were later disallowed by the IRS.                    
               However, to raise this issue, Hoyt would have to admit                 
               to his fraudulent actions concerning the IRA plan,                     
               which of course he did not.  The effect of Hoyt’s                      
               conflicts of interest on the tax assessments ultimately                
               suffered by his victims should be considered under the                 
               expanded RRA 1998 equity provisions.                                   
               4.  Offer in Compromise or Other Collection Alternative                
               Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin will not be able to pay the full                 
               Hoyt liability, which is currently estimated to be                     
               approximately $130,000, which amount includes both the                 
               assessed years 1981 through 19861 and the unassessed                   
               years 1987 through 1996.  The entire liability should                  
               be considered when determining Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin’s                 
               ability to pay.  Consideration should also be give                     
               [sic] to the financial hardship payment will cause when                
               Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin retire.  See Code sec. 7122(c)(1)                
               as added by section 3462(a) of RRA 1998 (Public Law No.                
               105-206).  Any tax payment by the Bergevins will                       
               significantly impact their ability to provide for                      
               necessary living expenses during retirement.  In the                   
               Conference Report of RRA 1998, Congress expressed its                  
               intent “that the IRS [in formulating these rules] take                 
               into account factors such as equity, hardship, and                     
               public policy where a compromise of an individual                      
               taxpayer’s income tax liability would promote effective                
               tax administration.”  H. Conf. Rep. 599, 105th Cong.,                  
               2d Sess 289 (1998).  We are currently in process of                    
               updating Mr. and Mrs. Bergevin’s financial information                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008