Robert A. Franklin - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          additional information before that conference.  On January 18,              
          2002, Mr. Schultz provided the additional information.  On                  
          January 22, 2002, Agent Kelley, Mr. Schultz, petitioner, and                
          Group Manager Carter attended a conference, at which they could             
          not agree.                                                                  
               During February 2002, Agent Kelley was temporarily                     
          reassigned.  On February 4 and 14, 2002, Agent Kelley informed              
          Mr. Schultz of the temporary reassignment.  Agent Kelley was                
          temporarily reassigned during parts of February and March 2002.             
          On March 4, 2002, Agent Kelley contacted Mr. Schultz and worked             
          on petitioner’s case.  On April 17, 2002, respondent determined             
          that the case should be closed unagreed.  On April 23, 2002,                
          respondent closed the case unagreed.                                        
               On May 2, 2002, respondent issued petitioner a Letter 950              
          (30-day letter) for 1998, 1999, and 2000.  On May 31, 2002,                 
          Mr. Schultz requested consideration by respondent’s Appeals                 
          Office.  On June 17, 2002, respondent’s Tampa Appeals Office                
          received petitioner’s file.  On June 25, 2002, respondent                   
          assigned petitioner’s case to Appeals Officer Roger Caruso                  
          (AO Caruso) and mailed petitioner a letter informing him of                 
          AO Caruso’s receipt of the case.                                            
               On July 5, 2002, respondent sent petitioner a Form 872,                
          Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax, for 1998 and 1999.                
          Initially, Mr. Schultz informed respondent that petitioner did              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008