Francis M. Gagliardi - Page 23




                                       - 23 -                                         
              We find petitioner’s summaries of living expenses to be                 
         credible.  Respondent did not establish the amounts of any such              
         expenses that were not included in the summaries of living                   
         expenses, and respondent failed to present evidence to rebut                 
         petitioner’s summaries of living expenses.                                   
              C.  No “Increased Deficiency”                                           
              At trial and on brief, respondent alleges that Mr. Gagliardi            
         did not report all of his gambling winnings from the years in                
         issue (i.e., that he reported only the gambling winnings                     

         (...continued)                                                               
          procedure), contains guidance aimed at games of chance, such as             
          slot machines.  But see Rev. Proc. 77-29, sec. 3.02, 1977-2 C.B.            
          at 539.  At trial respondent’s counsel had great difficulty                 
          explaining exactly what a “gambling log” is and what petitioner             
          should have recorded in a gambling log.  Respondent’s counsel               
          stated that it was not realistic for someone to keep track of               
          every bet and that the revenue procedure does not require                   
          taxpayers to keep track of every bet (i.e., the revenue procedure           
          does not require a taxpayer to list how much he/she bet for each            
          slot machine “pull”).  Respondent’s counsel contended that to               
          keep a log for slot machine play, per the revenue procedure, a              
          taxpayer must know how much was wagered and how much was lost and           
          record it contemporaneously.  But see id.                                   
               We also note that the revenue procedure provides that                  
          “Verifiable documentation for gambling transactions includes but            
          is not limited to” Forms W-2G, wagering tickets, canceled checks,           
          credit records, and bank withdrawals--all of which are present              
          here.  Id. sec. 3, 1977-2 C.B. at 538.  Additionally, the revenue           
          procedure provides a method, keeping a gambling log, that the IRS           
          will consider as acceptable evidence for substantiation of                  
          wagering winnings and losses.  Id.  It does not contain the                 
          exclusive method for substantiating gambling losses.  Id. sec. 1,           
          1977-2 C.B. at 538 (“The purpose of this revenue procedure is to            
          provide guidelines to taxpayers concerning the treatment of                 
          wagering gains and losses for Federal income tax purposes and the           
          related responsibility for maintaining adequate records in                  
          support of winnings and losses.”).                                          





Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008