- 15 - reasonable doubt, and the material submitted by both sides must be viewed in the light most favorable to the opposing party; that is, all doubts as to the existence of an issue of material fact must be resolved against the movant. E.g., Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970); Dreher v. Sielaff, 636 F.2d 1141, 1143 n.4 (7th Cir. 1980); Kroh v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. at 390. 3. Abatement of Interest a. In General Section 6404(e)(1)9 authorizes the Commissioner to abate 9 Sec. 6404(e)(1) provides as follows: SEC. 6404. ABATEMENTS. * * * * * * * (e) Abatement of Interest Attributable to Unreasonable Errors and Delays by Internal Revenue Service.-- (1) In general.--In the case of any assessment of interest on-- (A) any deficiency attributable in whole or in part to any unreasonable error or delay by an officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service (acting in his official capacity) in performing a ministerial or managerial act, or (B) any payment of any tax described in section 6212(a) to the extent that any unreasonable error or delay in such payment is attributable to such an officer or employee being erroneous or dilatory in performing a ministerial or managerial act, (continued...)Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008