Henry M. Lloyd - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          letter, Mr. Silverberg stated in pertinent part:                            
                    Mr. Lloyd has been dealing, through me as his                     
               representative, with the Collections Division in                       
               Fairfax, Virginia, and with your [first] Offer Special-                
               ist * * *.  Mr. Lloyd has submitted Form 656 proposing                 
               Offers in Compromise to settle these liabilities due to                
               doubt as to collectibility.  Throughout a period ex-                   
               ceeding one year, * * * [the first offer specialist]                   
               has evaluated Mr. Lloyd’s Reasonable Collection Poten-                 
               tial (RCP) and has performed an extensive investigation                
               of his assets, his income potential and his costs of                   
               living.                                                                
                    After conducting his investigation, * * * [the                    
               first offer specialist] and Mr. Lloyd reached an agree-                
               ment in principle, whereby Mr. Lloyd submitted an                      
               Amended Form 656 in October, 2004, offering to pay                     
               $139,707 over an installment period of 84 months.  This                
               amount is 100 per cent of the RCP finally determined by                
               * * * [the first offer specialist].  For reasons which                 
               Mr. Lloyd and I do not understand, this OIC was treated                
               by the Service as withdrawn at the last minute, rather                 
               than accepted.  We were given the explanation that some                
               out-of-compliance situation had been identified, and                   
               that the OIC could not be considered until Mr. Lloyd                   
               was back in compliance.  Upon investigation, it was                    
               determined he was not out-of-compliance.  However, no                  
               action was taken on his OIC.  Instead, you have issued                 
               notices indicating you intend to levy.                                 
                    Mr. Lloyd is still willing to agree to the October                
               2004 OIC which is 100 per cent of his RCP.  He believes                
               that he and the IRS have an agreement.  However, for                   
               reasons unknown to us the Collections Division was                     
               unwilling to indicate its acceptance by signing off on                 
               the OIC.                                                               
                    Too much time has been invested by Mr. Lloyd and                  
               by the Service to waste it by treating the OIC as                      
               withdrawn.  The agreement should be signed and Mr.                     
               Lloyd should begin making the monthly installments                     
               which will put this matter to rest.                                    
                    Mr. Lloyd and I hereby request an opportunity to                  
               appear in person to discuss this matter at a CDP hear-                 
               ing.  Our hope is that an agreed OIC will result from                  
               that hearing. * * *                                                    






Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008