Curtis G. Lockett and Edna L. Lockett - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          Rules of Practice and Procedure, and all section references are             
          to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue.              
                                     Background                                       
               When they petitioned the Court, petitioners resided in                 
          Florida.                                                                    
               Petitioners filed joint Federal income tax returns for the             
          years at issue.  In the notice of deficiency, respondent                    
          disallowed the following amounts of deductions that petitioners             
          claimed on their returns:1                                                  
                                    2001           2002          2003                 
          Itemized deductions     $480,776        $12,419     $26,015                 
          Business expenses   61,632     1,065,543      64,931                        
          Theft/destruction of     36,000    1,500,000           --                   
          property losses                                                             
          Moving expenses          -–        41,952              --                   
               Petitioners timely petitioned this Court.  At the time of              
          trial, the parties had entered into no stipulations, contrary to            
          Rule 91(a) and the Court’s standing pretrial order.  Petitioners            
          also failed to comply with the Court’s order, dated May 8, 2006,            
          granting respondent’s motions to compel production of documents             
          and to compel responses to interrogatories.  The case was                   


               1 In the notice of deficiency, respondent also determined              
          that petitioners had unreported dividend income of $113 and $248            
          for 2001 and 2003, respectively, and unreported interest income             
          of $16 for 2002.  Respondent also determined that petitioners               
          owed $30 additional tax for the early distribution of retirement            
          income pursuant to sec. 72(t).  Petitioners have not assigned               
          error to these determinations either in their pleadings or at               
          trial.  Consequently, we sustain respondent’s determinations as             
          to these items.                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008