- 7 - precluding the allowance of any casualty loss deduction with respect to their house. See Zmuda v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 714, 727-728 (1982), affd. 731 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1984); Millsap v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 751, 760 (1966), affd. 387 F.2d 420 (8th Cir. 1968).5 Petitioners contend that additional losses of an indeterminate amount arose from an illegal foreclosure action in 2001, which they characterize as a theft. This Court has previously questioned whether an illegal foreclosure action is a theft for purposes of section 165(c). See Johnson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2001-97. We need not decide this issue, however, because petitioners have failed to show that the alleged foreclosure action was illegal and have also failed to substantiate the amount of the alleged losses. Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination. 2. Claimed Loss of Computer Equipment On their 2001 Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed negative $36,000 as “Other gains or (losses).” On their 2002 Federal income tax return, petitioners claimed negative $1.5 million as “Other income.” Petitioners claim that these amounts represent losses arising from the theft and destruction of a 5 Petitioner husband testified, without reference to any supporting evidence, that petitioners paid $115,000 for the property. Petitioners otherwise have offered no evidence to establish the adjusted basis of their house.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008