-2- determination was issued to petitioner for the years at issue. Petitioner contends that no final notice of intent to levy was sent to him, and therefore respondent’s levy is improper. Background At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in California. On March 13, 2006, respondent sent petitioner by certified mail a Final Notice-Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing for the years 2000 through 2003. The notice of intent to levy was returned to respondent marked refused/unclaimed on April 17, 2006. On February 2, 2007, respondent sent petitioner by regular mail a Warning of Intent to Levy. On May 8, 2007, respondent levied upon petitioner’s accounts. On June 25, 2007, petitioner submitted his petition, and the Court filed his motion to restrain collection. Respondent objected to petitioner’s motion on the ground that the Court lacked jurisdiction. On August 13, 2007, the Court filed respondent’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. A hearing on the motions was held on October 15, 2007, in San Francisco, California. 1(...continued) Internal Revenue Code as amended. Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. Amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008