Dan Pickell - Page 3




                                         -3-                                          
                                     Discussion                                       
               The Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and we may           
          exercise that jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by                 
          Congress.  Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).  The            
          Court’s jurisdiction under sections 6320 and 6330 depends upon              
          the issuance of a valid notice of determination and the filing of           
          a timely petition for review.  See Orum v. Commissioner, 123 T.C.           
          1 (2004), affd. 412 F.3d 819 (7th Cir. 2005); Sarrell v.                    
          Commissioner, 117 T.C. 122, 125 (2001); Moorhous v. Commissioner,           
          116 T.C. 263, 269 (2001); Offiler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 492,            
          498 (2000); see also Rule 330(b).  Thus, in the absence of a                
          notice of determination, this Court lacks jurisdiction.                     
          Respondent did not issue a notice of determination in respect of            
          petitioner’s outstanding tax liabilities for 2000 through 2003.             
          A necessary predicate for the issuance of a notice of                       
          determination is the issuance of a final notice of intent to levy           
          sent to the taxpayer at the taxpayer’s last known address.  See             
          sec. 6330(a)(2)(C).  Thus, while the Court does not have                    
          jurisdiction to hear petitioner’s case, we will decide the proper           
          basis for dismissal.  See Kennedy v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 255,            
          263 (2001); Kennedy v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2008-33; Buffano            
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2007-32.                                        
               Respondent argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction because            
          a notice of determination under section 6330 was not issued to              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008