Lawrence Jay Russ - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Section 6320 provides that a taxpayer shall be notified in             
          writing by the Secretary of the filing of a notice of Federal tax           
          lien and provided with an opportunity for an administrative                 
          hearing.  If timely requested, the Office of Appeals conducts an            
          administrative hearing under section 6320 in accordance with the            
          procedural requirements of section 6330.3  Sec. 6320(c).  At the            
          administrative hearing, a taxpayer is entitled to raise any                 
          relevant issue relating to the unpaid tax, including a spousal              
          defense or collection alternatives such as an offer-in-compromise           
          or an installment agreement.  Sec. 6330(c)(2); sec. 301.6330-               
          1(e)(1), Proced. & Admin. Regs.  A taxpayer also may challenge              
          the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability,                    

               3 Sec. 6330(b)(3) ensures a measure of impartiality by                 
          requiring that, unless the taxpayer waives the requirement, the             
          sec. 6330 hearing be conducted by an AO who has had no prior                
          involvement with the unpaid tax at issue in the hearing.  Murphy            
          v. Commissioner, 125 T.C. 301, 324-325 (2005), affd. 469 F.3d 27            
          (1st Cir. 2006).  Respondent filed the notice of Federal tax lien           
          on Mar. 17, 2005, and assigned the administrative appeal of the             
          OIC to an AO on Mar. 18, 2005.  Respondent sent petitioner a                
          Notice of Federal Tax Lien Filing and Your Right to a Hearing               
          Under IRC 6320 dated Mar. 24, 2005.  Respondent initially                   
          assigned petitioner’s request for a sec. 6320 hearing, submitted            
          Apr. 28, 2005, to a different AO.  On Sept. 15, 2005, the OIC AO            
          consulted with petitioner, took responsibility for both the OIC             
          appeal and the sec. 6320 hearing, and scheduled a face-to-face              
          hearing for Oct. 5, 2005.  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(A)(III) requires the             
          AO to consider collection alternatives raised by the taxpayer,              
          which, in this case, include the reconsideration of the rejected            
          OIC.  Petitioner has not claimed that the AO’s assignment to both           
          the OIC appeal and the sec. 6320 hearing violated sec.                      
          6330(b)(3).  In any event, we conclude that it did not, because             
          the OIC appeal and the sec. 6320 hearing were conducted                     
          simultaneously by an AO with no prior involvement with the unpaid           
          taxes at issue.                                                             





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008