Lawrence Jay Russ - Page 12




                                       - 11 -                                         
               Petitioner received a notice of deficiency for the tax year            
          1999 and thus may not dispute the underlying deficiency for that            
          year.4  For the remaining tax years, petitioner had the                     
          opportunity at the section 6320 hearing to challenge the                    
          underlying tax liabilities but did not.  “This statutory                    
          preclusion is triggered by the opportunity to contest the                   
          underlying liability, even if the opportunity is not pursued.”              
          Bell v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 356, 358 (2006); Goza v.                     
          Commissioner, supra at 182-183.  Accordingly, we review                     
          respondent’s determination for abuse of discretion.                         
               Section 6159 authorizes the Secretary to enter into a                  
          written installment agreement with a taxpayer if such an                    
          agreement will facilitate the full or partial collection of the             
          tax liability.  Section 7122(a) permits the Secretary to                    
          compromise tax liabilities.  Section 7122(c) requires the                   
          Secretary to prescribe guidelines for evaluating offers in                  
          compromise and to “develop and publish schedules of national and            
          local allowances designed to provide that taxpayers entering into           
          a compromise have an adequate means to provide for basic living             
          expenses.”  Sec. 7122(c)(1) and (2)(A).                                     




               4 Furthermore, petitioner already petitioned this Court for            
          redetermination of the deficiency for 1999.  As mentioned supra             
          p. 3, that case resulted in a stipulated decision, and respondent           
          assessed the deficiency stipulated in that decision.                        





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008