Solutions Plus, Inc. - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
         protest a copy of a one-page handout entitled “Educational                   
         Solutions” stating that petitioner has developed an educational              
         curriculum.  Petitioner also attached a copy of “Articles of                 
         Amendment” purporting to amend its bylaws by removing Mr.                    
         Dennis’s wife as a director and adding two other individuals as              
         directors.                                                                   
         E.  Denial of Petitioner’s Application for Exemption                         
              Ultimately, on September 15, 2006, respondent issued a final            
         adverse determination letter, upon which the instant declaratory             
         judgment action is based.  In the letter, respondent determined              
         that petitioner did not qualify for exemption under section                  
         501(a) as an organization described under section 501(c)(3)                  
         because petitioner:  (1) Was not organized exclusively for exempt            
         purposes; (2) was not operated exclusively for exempt purposes;              
         and (3) failed to establish that it did not operate for a                    
         substantial nonexempt purpose.                                               
              Respondent stated that petitioner’s origination script was              
         entirely devoted to selling DMPs and obtaining information about             
         the caller’s unsecured debt and that the script did not provide              
         for determining the caller’s broader financial situation,                    
         assisting the caller in making a budget, or proposing any                    
         alternatives to the DMP.  Respondent noted petitioner did not                
         provide any of the meaningful educational materials that                     
         petitioner claimed to be developing.  Respondent further noted               







Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008