- 41 - finish the final retitlement of the [Rivercliff] Property * * *. After discovering that substantial amounts were wire transferred from NCPL’s and TPPL’s Hong Kong bank accounts to petitioner’s and SSI’s bank accounts, on May 24, 2004, Agent Rans mailed petitioner a Form 4564 with two consent directives for petitioner’s signature. An attached letter stated: Attached are two documents (consent directives) that I would like you to sign and mail back to me. The purpose of the documents is to send to the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and the Citic Ka Wa bank in Hong Kong to request records. You have stated that you have no control over those accounts. In that case, the banks would not have the authority to release the requested records to me. This would possibly be one way of verifying that you do not have control over these accounts. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this request. Respondent was required to obtain consent to acquire the information because the United States and Hong Kong do not have a treaty allowing the IRS to subpoena a U.S. citizen’s bank account information from Hong Kong banks. In response, on May 30, 2004, petitioner mailed a letter stating that he did not have an offshore bank account and his employer prohibited him from signing the consent directives. Petitioner returned the consent directive unsigned. On September 9, 2004, petitioner and Ms. Chen, on behalf of NCPL, executed a Memorandum of Confirmation and Agreement, which states:Page: Previous 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008