Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159, 22 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22

180

DAWSON v. DELAWARE

Thomas, J., dissenting

standard stated in Payne and therefore satisfied the requirements of due process. Dawson has presented no convincing argument, based on the record as a whole, that the courts misapplied these standards to the facts of his case. For these reasons, I would affirm.

Page:   Index   Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22

Last modified: October 4, 2007