Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Huddleston, 507 U.S. 60, 27 (1993)

Page:   Index   Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27

86

ITEL CONTAINERS INT'L CORP. v. HUDDLESTON

Blackmun, J., dissenting

been 'unmistakably clear.' " Taylor, 477 U. S., at 139, quoting South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke, 467 U. S. 82, 91 (1984). "The need for affirmative approval is heightened by the fact that [Tennessee's tax] has substantial ramifications beyond the Nation's borders." Id., at 92, n. 7. Not only does the majority invert this analysis by finding congressional authorization for the tax in congressional silence, but it finds silence only by imposing its own narrow reading on the Conventions.

The majority invites States that are constantly in need of new revenue to impose new taxes on containers. The result, I fear, will be a patchwork of state taxes that will burden international commerce and frustrate the purposes of the Container Conventions. I respectfully dissent.

Page:   Index   Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27

Last modified: October 4, 2007