92
Thomas, J., dissenting
rest and being in custody, was not the fruit of the fact" that a judicial determination of probable cause was not made within the 48-hour period mandated by McLaughlin. Harris, supra, at 20. Under these circumstances, suppression is not warranted under our precedents.
* * *
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment below should be affirmed.
I respectfully dissent.
Page: Index Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Last modified: October 4, 2007