Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal., 512 U.S. 298, 3 (1994)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

300

BARCLAYS BANK PLC v. FRANCHISE TAX BD. OF CAL.

Syllabus

tional California's otherwise valid, congressionally condoned scheme. Pp. 320-331.

No. 92-1384, 10 Cal. App. 4th 1742, 14 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, and No. 92-1839,

10 Cal. App. 4th 1768, 13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 761, affirmed.

Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and Blackmun, Stevens, Kennedy, and Souter, JJ., joined, and in all but Part IV-B of which Scalia, J., joined. Blackmun, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 331. Scalia, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, post, p. 331. O'Connor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Thomas, J., joined, post, p. 332.

Joanne M. Garvey argued the cause for petitioner in No. 92-1384. With her on the briefs were Joan K. Irion, Miles N. Ruthberg, and Teresa A. Maloney. James P. Kleier argued the cause for petitioner in No. 92-1839. With him on the briefs were Walter Hellerstein, Prentiss Willson, Jr., Clare M. Rathbone, and Franklin C. Latcham.

Timothy G. Laddish, Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent in both cases. With him on the brief for respondent in No. 92-1384 were Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of California, Robert D. Milam, Deputy Attorney General, and Benjamin F. Miller. Mr. Lungren, Lawrence K. Keethe, Supervising Deputy Attorney General of California, John D. Schell, Deputy Attorney General, and Claudia K. Land filed a brief for respondent in No. 92-1839.

Solicitor General Days argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance in both cases. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Argrett and Deputy Solicitor General Wallace.

Kendall L. Houghton and William D. Peltz filed a brief for the Committee on State Taxation as amicus curiae urging reversal in both cases.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal in No. 92-1384 were filed for the Government of the United Kingdom by Jerome B. Libin and William H. Morris; for the Member States of the European Communities et al. by Messrs. Libin and Morris; for Banque Nationale de Paris by Roy E. Crawford and Russell D. Uzes; for the Confederation of British Industry by Lee H. Spence; for the Council of Netherlands Industrial Federations by

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: October 4, 2007