Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415, 37 (1994)

Page:   Index   Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37

Cite as: 512 U. S. 415 (1994)

Ginsburg, J., dissenting

added); the verdict in this particular case, considered in light of this Court's decisions in Haslip and TXO, hardly appears "so 'grossly excessive' as to violate the substantive component of the Due Process Clause," TXO, 509 U. S., at 458. Accordingly, the Court's procedural directive to the state court is neither necessary nor proper. The Supreme Court of Oregon has not refused to enforce federal law, and I would affirm its judgment.

451

Page:   Index   Previous  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37

Last modified: October 4, 2007