Duncan v. Henry, 513 U.S. 364, 10 (1995) (per curiam)

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Cite as: 513 U. S. 364 (1995)

Stevens, J., dissenting

This Court should not abruptly terminate thoughtful debate among conscientious Circuit judges by summarily announcing a new rule. If we are to depart from the standard set forth in Picard and Harless, we should do so only after thorough consideration with the benefit of full briefing and argument. I respectfully dissent.

373

Page:   Index   Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10

Last modified: October 4, 2007