Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 34 (1995)

Page:   Index   Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34

Cite as: 515 U. S. 472 (1995)

Breyer, J., dissenting

Because the Court of Appeals remanded this case to the District Court for consideration of these matters, and because, as explained in Parts II-IV, supra, I believe it correctly decided that Conner was deprived of liberty within the meaning of the Due Process Clause, I would affirm its judgment. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.

505

Page:   Index   Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34

Last modified: October 4, 2007