Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 24 (2001)

Page:   Index   Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Cite as: 533 U. S. 194 (2001)

Opinion of Souter, J.

that term is explained in Graham v. Connor, there is simply no work for a qualified immunity inquiry to do.

Justice Souter, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I join Parts I and II of the Court's opinion, but would remand the case for application of the qualified immunity standard.

217

Page:   Index   Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: October 4, 2007