Lamie v. United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526 (2004)

Page:   Index   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

526

OCTOBER TERM, 2003

Syllabus

LAMIE v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit

No. 02-693. Argued November 10, 2003—Decided January 26, 2004

Before 1994, 330(a) of the Bankruptcy Code authorized a court to "award to a trustee, to an examiner, to a professional person employed under section 327 . . . , or to the debtor's attorney" "(1) reasonable compensation for . . . services rendered by such trustee, examiner, professional person, or attorney . . . ." (Emphasis added to highlight text later deleted.) In 1994 Congress amended the Code with a reform Act. The Act altered 330(a) by deleting "or to the debtor's attorney" from what was 330(a) and is now 330(a)(1). This change created an apparent legislative drafting error in the current section. The section is left with a missing "or" that infects its grammar. And its inclusion of "attorney" in what was 330(a)(1) and is now 330(a)(1)(A) defeats the neat parallelism that otherwise marks the relationship between current 330(a)(1) ("trustee, . . . examiner, [or] professional person") and 330(a)(1)(A) ("trustee, examiner, professional person, or attorney"). In this case, petitioner filed an application with the Bankruptcy Court seeking attorney's fees under 330(a)(1) for the time he spent working on behalf of a debtor in a Chapter 7 proceeding. The Government objected to the application. It argued that 330(a) makes no provision for the estate to compensate an attorney who is not employed by the estate trustee and approved by the court under 327. Petitioner admitted he was not employed by the trustee and approved by the court under 327, but nonetheless contended 330(a) authorized a fee award to him because he was a debtor's attorney. In denying petitioner's application, the Bankruptcy Court, District Court, and Fourth Circuit all held that in a Chapter 7 proceeding 330(a)(1) does not authorize payment of attorney's fees unless the attorney has been appointed under 327.

Held: Under the Code's plain language, 330(a)(1) does not authorize compensation awards to debtors' attorneys from estate funds, unless they are employed as authorized by 327. If the attorney is to be paid from estate funds under 330(a)(1) in a Chapter 7 case, he must be employed by the trustee and approved by the court. Pp. 533-542. (a) Petitioner argues that this Court must look to legislative history to determine Congress' intent because the existing statutory text is

Page:   Index   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: October 4, 2007