§ 18.2-185. Evidence and presumptions in malicious prosecution actions after issuance of bad check
In any civil action growing out of an arrest under § 18.2-181 or § 18.2-182, no evidence of statements or representations as to the status of the check, draft, order or deposit involved, or of any collateral agreement with reference to the check, draft, or order, shall be admissible unless such statements, or representations, or collateral agreement, be written upon the instrument at the time it is given by the drawer.
If payment of any check, draft, or order for the payment of money be refused by the bank, banking institution, trust company or other depository upon which such instrument is drawn, and the person who drew or uttered such instrument be arrested or prosecuted under the provisions of § 18.2-181 or § 18.2-182, for failure or refusal to pay such instrument, the one who arrested or caused such person to be arrested and prosecuted, or either, shall be conclusively deemed to have acted with reasonable or probable cause in any suit for damages that may be brought by the person who drew or uttered such instrument, if the one who arrested or caused such person to be arrested and prosecuted, or either, shall have, before doing so, presented or caused such instrument to be presented to the depository on which it was drawn where it was refused, and then waited five days after notice, as provided in § 18.2-183, without the amount due under the provisions of such instrument being paid.
(Code 1950, § 6.1-118; 1966, c. 584; 1975, cc. 14, 15.)Sections: Previous 18.2-180 18.2-181 18.2-181.1 18.2-182 18.2-182.1 18.2-183 18.2-184 18.2-185 18.2-186 18.2-186.1 18.2-186.2 18.2-186.3 18.2-186.3:1 18.2-186.4 18.2-186.5 Next
Last modified: April 16, 2009