Ex parte SHIVELY - Page 2




          Appeal No. 93-3623                                          Page 2           
          Application 07/629,690                                                       
          part of 06/896,724 (filed 15 August 1986, now abandoned).  The               
          07/072,754 application was the subject of Ex parte Shively,                  
          Appeal No. 90-2219 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 27 Aug. 1990),                    
          affirmed, Appeal No. 91-1025 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (Fed. Cir. R. 36).             
               3.   Appellant indicates (Paper 18 (App. Brief) at 3) that              
          the Federal Circuit also reviewed his 06/896,724 application as              
          part of a consolidated appeal.  The record indicates that the                
          Federal Circuit reviewed the 06/892,579 application, filed                   
          1 August 1986, now abandoned.  Ex parte Shively, Appeal                      
          No. 89-2337 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 27 Aug. 1990), affirmed,                 
          Appeal No. 91-1024 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (Fed. Cir. R. 36).  Appellant            
          has not indicated a claim for the benefit of 06/892,579                      
          application in the present application.                                      
               4.   The present application is a divisional application                
          from the 07/174,956 application.  (Paper 2 (Req. Div. Appl'n.).)             
          The resulting 5,061,635 patent has method, but not apparatus,                
          claims.                                                                      
               5.   The present application is entitled "Protein or peptide            
          sequencing method and apparatus".  The subject matter of the                 
          invention is reactors for peptide sequenators.  (Paper 1 (Spec.)             
          at 1.)                                                                       
               6.   The claims on appeal broadly encompass three distinct              
          embodiments.  Claims 1, 9, and 19 illustrate the first (Fig. 1),             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007