THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte REN XU and KUEIR-WEEI CHOUR
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3649
Application 08/344,5091
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and WEIFFENBACH, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 USC § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1 through 29.
Claim 1 is representative and is reproduced below:
1. A method for the chemical vapor deposition of a
heterometaloxide film, comprising:
selecting a volatile precursor which contains
1Application for patent filed November 23, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007