Ex parte XU et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-3649                                                          
          Application 08/344,509                                                      


          particularly for the broadly drafted claims that are now present            
          in this appeal.                                                             
               The examiner’s rejection of claim 12 is reversed.  The                 
          rejection of all other claims is affirmed.  Accordingly, the                
          decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                               








               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 

                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    





                                                       )                              
                         EDWARD C. KIMLIN              )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         JOHN D. SMITH                 )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                

                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007