Ex parte XU et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 96-3649                                                          
          Application 08/344,509                                                      


          (films having undefined stoichiometry) were not further tested.             
               We also do not agree with appellants’ argument that the                
          references provide no suggestion as to how to produce a                     
          stoichiometric double metal oxide film.  Admittedly, Sladek only            
          describes the successful formation of single metal oxide films by           
          using a vapor phase hydrolysis chemical vapor deposition                    
          technique.  Importantly, however, Sladek indicates that the films           
          were all obtained at low temperatures, i.e., from 25 to 130EC.              
          Remembering that the problem of using a known double metal                  
          alkoxide in a standard MOCVD process is the premature thermal               
          decomposition of the alkoxide into the respective individual                
          metal alkoxide components because of the high temperature                   
          conditions required for pyrolysis (specification, page 7), one of           
          ordinary skill in the art would have been led to utilize such a             
          double metal alkoxide precursor in the low temperature vapor                
          phase hydrolysis chemical vapor deposition technique of Sladek              
          with a reasonable expectation of producing a stoichiometric                 
          double metal oxide film.  Based on the above analysis, it is our            
          view that a prima facie case of obviousness has been established            
          for the subject matter defined by independent claim 1 and those             
          claims dependent thereon.                                                   
               Appellants have asked for separate consideration of several            

                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007