Appeal No. 94-2990
Application 07/932,577
or the compound of formula II in the form [sic, of] a
physiologically tolerable salt [emphasis added].
THE REFERENCES
In rejecting claims 11 through 23 on prior art grounds, the
examiner relies on the following references:
Ertel et al. (Ertel) 4,061,767 Dec. 6, 1977
Kammerer et al. (Kammerer) 4,284,786 Aug. 18, 1981
Bartlett et al. (Bartlett) 4,965,276 Oct. 23, 1990
Auchincloss, Transplantation, “Xenogeneic Transplantation”, Vol.
46, No. 1, pages 1-10 (July 1989).
Appellant cites and relies on the following references:
Fundamental Immunology, William E. Paul, Second Edition, Chapter
33, pages 906 and 907 (1989).
Roitt et al. (Roitt), Immunology, Gower Medical Publishing, New
York, page 24.5 (1985).
THE ISSUE
The issue presented for review is whether the examiner erred
in rejecting claims 11 through 23 under 35 USC § 103 as
unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Auchincloss, Ertel,
Kammerer, and Bartlett.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007