Appeal No. 94-2990 Application 07/932,577 DELIBERATIONS Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the following materials: (1) The instant specification, including all of the claims on appeal; (2) Appellant’s main Brief and Reply Brief before the Board; (3) The Examiner’s Answer and the communication mailed by the examiner February 22, 1994; and (4) The above-cited references relied on by both appellant and the examiner. On consideration of the record, including the above-listed materials, we reverse the examiner’s rejection under 35 USC § 103. DISCUSSION Claims 11 through 15, 22 and 23 are directed to a method of treating hyperacute rejection reactions of an organ recipient to a transplanted organ. Based on our review of the record, we find 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007