THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte YASUTOSHI AOKI and YASUTAKA ENOKI _____________ Appeal No. 94-3608 Application 07/844,9801 ______________ HEARD: July 14, 1997 _______________ Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and ABRAMS and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges. ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1Application for patent filed March 2, 1992. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/598,030, filed October 16, 1990, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007