Appeal No. 94-3608 Application 07/844,980 The references relied upon by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Brown 3,157,218 Nov. 17, 1964 Greiner 3,759,306 Sep. 18, 1973 Russell 3,830,275 Aug. 20, 1974 Mamada et al. (British '048) 2,190,048 Nov. 11, 1987 (UK Patent Application) Kazuyuki (Japanese '403) 63-240403 Oct. 6, 1988 4,724,878 (English Language Equivalent) Japan (Japanese '305) 2-169305 June 29, 1990 313,361 (English Language Equivalent) Okuno (Japanese '904) 58-128904 Aug. 1, 1983 (Japan) The prior art admitted by the appellants on pages 1 and 2 of the specification.2 THE REJECTIONS The following rejections stand under 35 U.S.C. § 103: (1) Claims 1 through 3, 8, 10, 13 through 15 and 22 through 25 on the basis of Japanese '904, Japanese '403, Russell, Brown and British '048. 2 We note that the examiner has failed to list the admitted prior art as a reference on pages 2 and 3 of the Answer, although it has been applied in two of the rejections of the appellants' claims (pages 11 through 16). 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007