THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte HORST KNOCH, NORBERT NIESEMEYER and WILFRIED REISSENWEBER _____________ Appeal No. 95-0072 Application 07/922,7961 ______________ HEARD: March 7, 1997 _______________ Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and CALVERT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Horst Knoch, Norbert Niesemeyer and Wilfried Reissenweber ("appellants") appeal from the final rejection of 1Application for patent filed July 31, 1992. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007