Appeal No. 95-0072 Application 07/922,796 The references relied upon by the examiner are: Ollis 4,033,800 July 5, 1977 Allan et al 2 085 324 April 28, 1982 (Published UK application) Claims 1 through 5, 7, 8, and 13 through 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Ollis. The examiner characterizes the teachings of Ollis in the following manner: The Ollis patent discloses an apparatus for applying a filling compound or shielding composition to electrical cables wherein a composition, 12, (col. 1, line 66) is introduced into a main filling chamber, 26, and a bypass or branch opening, 30, carries composition from main filling chamber to pre-filling chamber, 22, (col. 2, lines 51-58). The pre-filling chamber is provided with a common admission channel having a diameter only slightly greater than that of the bundle of cables, as illustrated in Figure 2. The cylindrical passage connecting the pre-filling chamber to the main filling chamber functions as does Appellants' coating nozzle, and cylinder opening, 24, (col. 2, line 48) calibrates the diameter of the coated bundle exiting the main filling chamber [answer, p. 3]. In the examiner's view, Ollis discloses an apparatus corresponding to that claimed by the appellants except that Ollis utilizes "a single channel or opening, 22, which functions both to receive loose strands and to ‘pre-fill’ voids between the strands, as opposed to Appellants' separate admission and pre- filling channels" (answer, pages 3-4). On the basis of this 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007