THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALEX JUNINO, QUANG LAN N’GUYEN, REMY TULOUP, and
CHRISTIAN BLAISE
__________
Appeal No. 95-1274
Application No. 07/914,1501
__________
HEARD: June 13, 1997
__________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS, and McFARLANE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McFARLANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow
claims 1 through 6. In an amendment subsequent to the final2
rejection, claim 1 has been amended, claim 7 has been canceled
1Application for patent filed July 16, 1992.
2The examiner indicated entry of the amendment (filed
March 18, 1994 (Paper No. 12) after the final rejection.
However, it was not clerically entered. For the purpose of this
appeal, we will consider the amendment as having been entered.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007