Ex parte AL EX JUNINO, et al. - Page 1

                                        THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          
                This opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not                                                       
                written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of                                                  
                the Board.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                         Paper No. 26                         

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                       Ex parte ALEX JUNINO, QUANG LAN N’GUYEN, REMY TULOUP, and                                                              
                                                         CHRISTIAN BLAISE                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 95-1274                                                                    
                                                Application No. 07/914,1501                                                                   
                                                      HEARD: June 13, 1997                                                                    
                Before KIMLIN, OWENS, and McFARLANE, Administrative Patent                                                                    
                McFARLANE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                       
                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is an appeal from the examiner's refusal to allow                                                               
                claims 1 through 6.  In an amendment  subsequent to the final2                                                                 
                rejection, claim 1 has been amended, claim 7 has been canceled                                                                

                         1Application for patent filed July 16, 1992.                                                                         
                         2The examiner indicated entry of the amendment (filed                                                                
                March 18, 1994 (Paper No. 12) after the final rejection.                                                                      
                However, it was not clerically entered.  For the purpose of this                                                              
                appeal, we will consider the amendment as having been entered.                                                                

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007