JUDGMENT THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 134 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ HUGH A. THOMPSON and EDWARD H. KRAUTTER Junior Party1 v. BOBBY M. PHILLIPS, SHRIRAM BARGRODIA, WILLIAM A. HAILE, HARRY P. HALL, DAVID A. CASEY, J. NELSON DALTON, RONNIE J. JONES, RONALD S. SCALF, RICHARD D. NEAL, LEWIS C. TRENT and JACK L. NELSON Senior Party2 _____________ Patent Interference No. 103,601 ______________ Before SOFOCLEOUS, CAROFF and DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. 1Application 07/773,164, filed October 8, 1991, now U.S. Patent No 5,200,248, issued April 6, 1993, which is a continuation of application 07/428,446, filed February 20, 1990, now abandoned. 2Application 07/736,267, filed July 23, 1991, which is according to appellants, a continuation-in-part of application 07/333,651, issued April 4, 1989, now abandoned. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007