Interference No. 103601
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
Whereas neither party to this interference has filed a
response to the Order To Show Cause of July 22, 1997 (Paper
No. 133) within the time set therefor, pursuant to that order
judgment is hereby entered as follows:
JUDGMENT
In view of the finding in Paper No. 133 that there is no
interference-in-fact:
Thompson et al, the junior party patentees, are entitled
to their patent containing involved claims 1-48.
Phillips et al, the senior party applicants, are entitled
to a separate patent containing their involved claims 1, 193,
220, 224-25, 232, 234, 240 and 244.
In view of the foregoing judgment, the preliminary
statements filed in this interference (Paper Nos. 24, 45)
remain sealed and will be returned to the respective parties
who submitted them in accordance with 37 CFR 1.631(c).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007