THOMPSON et al. V. PHILLIPS et al. - Page 3

          Interference No. 103601                                                     



               In view of footnote 5 in Paper No. 133, and in order to                
          comply with their duty of disclosure, Phillips et al are                    
          hereby ordered to call the primary examiner’s attention to the              
          motion(s) filed by Thompson et al which raise questions                     
          concerning the patentability/enforceability of the claims in                
          the involved Phillips et al application upon resumption of ex               
          parte prosecution.                                                          




                         )                                                            
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                                                      )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) INTERFERENCES                
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              










                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007