THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ALEJANDRO A. ARUFFO and NITIN DAMLE __________ Appeal No. 94-1696 Application 07/811,1291 __________ HEARD November 15, 1996 __________ Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal of the final rejection of claims 1 through 17, all the claims pending in the application. Claims 1, 2 and 9 are illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and read as follows: 1Application for patent filed December 20, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007