Appeal No. 94-1696 Application 07/811,129 de Fougerolles et al. (de Fougerolles), “Characterization of ICAM-2 and Evidence for a Third Counter-Receptor for LFA-1," J. Exp. Med., vol. 174, pp. 253-267 (1991). Dustin et al. (Dustin), “Induction by IL 1 and Interferon-(: Tissue Distribution, Biochemistry, and Function of a Natural Adherence Molecule (ICAM-1),” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 137, pp. 245-254 (1986). Makgoba et al. (Makgoba), “ICAM-1 a Ligand for LFA-1-Dependent Adhesion of B, T and Myeloid Cells,” Nature, vol. 331, pp. 86-88 (1988). Nortamo et al. (Nortamo), “A Monoclonal Antibody to the Human Leukocyte Adhesion Molecule Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-2,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 146, pp. 2530-2535 (1991). Claims 1 through 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Springer in view of Zettlmeissl. Having carefully considered the entire record which includes, inter alia, the specification, the appellants’ main Brief (Paper No. 12) and Reply Brief (Paper No. 15), the examiner’s Answer (Paper No. 13) and Supplemental Answer (Paper No. 16), we find ourselves in substantial agreement with the appellants’ position. Accordingly, we reverse the rejection. Our reasons follow. Background The appellants’ invention is directed to soluble fusion proteins which comprise a first region capable of binding to the 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007