THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte OTTO IMMEL,
HARALD MULLER
_____________
Appeal No. 94-1863
Application 07/832,1541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, JOHN D. SMITH and WARREN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
SOFOCLEOUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 8
and 10 to 16. Claim 9 stands allowed.
1Application for patent filed February 6, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007