THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT L. METCALF and RICHARD L. LAMPMAN
________________
Appeal No. 94-2842
Application 07/882,3511
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
1 Application for patent filed May 6, 1992. According to
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application
07/759,114, filed September 9, 1991, now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Application 07/435,950, filed November 13, 1989,
now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/170,159, filed, March 18, 1988, now Patent No. 4,880,624,
issued November 14, 1989.
-1-1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007